Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Award-winning journalist Michael Hastings, who penned article that ended Gen. Stanley McChrystal's career, dies in crash

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 19 Juni 2013 | 10.46

LOS ANGELES — Award-winning journalist and war correspondent Michael Hastings, whose unflinching reporting ended the career of a top American army general, died early Tuesday in a car accident in Los Angeles, his employer and family said.

Hastings, who was 33, was described by many of his colleagues as an unfailingly bright and hard-charging reporter who wrote stories that mattered. Most recently, he wrote about politics for the news website BuzzFeed, where the top editor said colleagues were devastated by the loss.

"Michael was a great, fearless journalist with an incredible instinct for the story, and a gift for finding ways to make his readers care about anything he covered from wars to politicians," said Ben Smith, BuzzFeed's editor-in-chief.

AP

Award-winning journalist and war correspondent Michael Hastings, killed in a car crash in Los Angeles today.

Smith said he learned of the death from a family member.

Authorities said there was a car crash early Tuesday in the Hancock Park neighborhood of Los Angeles that killed a man, but coroner's officials could not confirm whether Hastings was the victim.

Hastings won a 2010 George Polk Award for magazine reporting for his Rolling Stone cover story "The Runaway General."

His story was credited with ending Gen. Stanley McChrystal's career after it revealed the military's candid criticisms of the Obama administration.

Hastings quoted McChrystal and his aides mocking Obama administration officials, including Vice President Joe Biden, over their war policies.

At a Pentagon ceremony for his subsequent retirement in 2010, McChrystal made light of the episode in his farewell address. The four-star general warned his comrades in arms, "I have stories on all of you, photos of many, and I know a Rolling Stone reporter."

When he died, Hastings was a contributing editor at Rolling Stone, where Managing Editor Will Dana was quoted Tuesday saying Hastings exuded "a certain kind of electricity" that exists in great reporters whose stories burn to be told.

"I'm sad that I'll never get to publish all the great stories that he was going to write, and sad that he won't be stopping by my office for any more short visits which would stretch for two or three completely engrossing hours," Dana said.

Hastings was also an author of books about the wars. "The Operators: The Wild and Terrifying Inside Story of America's War in Afghanistan" was published late last year and details shocking exploits of the military overseas.

In 2010, with the publication of "I Lost My Love in Baghdad," Hastings told the story of being a young war correspondent whose girlfriend died in Iraq.

In the summer 2013 issue of Vermont Life magazine, Hastings was quoted telling an audience at the Burlington Book Festival that he doesn't believe in objectivity in journalism.

"What I try to do is be intellectually honest in my writing," he said.

Hastings' family moved to Vermont when he was 16, a state he told the magazine was his "spiritual home." According to the magazine, he lived in New York with his wife.


10.46 | 0 komentar | Read More

A new ‘World’

Written By Unknown on Selasa, 18 Juni 2013 | 10.46

If the waves of nostalgia ripple in 20-year cycles, Disney Channel is right on cue.

The cable network has ordered a spinoff of the hit '90s sitcom "Boy Meets World" called "Girl Meets World" — with original series stars Ben Savage and Danielle Fishel returning as a now-married couple dealing with a tweenage daughter of their own.

The series was co-created by original "Boy Meets World" creator/producers Michael Jacobs and April Kelly, with Jacobs also serving as an executive producer.

The key role of Cory (Savage) and Topanga's (Fishel) 14-year-old daughter, Riley Matthews, will be played by Rowan Blanchard, who's dealing with life at home and in her 7th grade middle school.

DEJA VU: Ben Savage and Danielle Fishel, in their

Disney Channel

DEJA VU: Ben Savage and Danielle Fishel, in their "Boy Meets World" days, are returning with a new series in which they're now the parents of 14-year-old Riley (Rowan Blanchard in the pink sleeves hugging her best friend, Maya, played by Sabrina Carpenter).

Ben Savage and Danielle Fishel in 'Boy Meets World'

Ben Savage and Danielle Fishel in 'Boy Meets World'

The original series, which aired on ABC from 1993-2000 as part of its popular "TGIF" Friday-night lineup — which also included "Family Matters," "Full House" and "Perfect Strangers" — took the romance between Cory and Topanga from the sixth grade all the way through college — when the couple eventually married and moved to New York City in the series finale when Topanga was offered a job at a law firm.

Set in Philadelphia, "Boy Meets World" aired for seven seasons and, at one point, was averaging nearly 12 million viewers, solid numbers for Friday night (the week's least-watched night of TV).

The original series co-starred William Daniels as Cory and Topanga's teacher, George Feeny;, Will Friedle as Cory's older brother, Eric; Betsy Randle as Cory's mom, Amy Matthews; and Rider Strong, who played Cory's best friend, Shawn.

In "Girl Meets World," Riley will be joined by her best friend, Maya (Sabrina Carpenter).

The series will be set in New York City, with Cory now a history teacher at Riley's middle school — with Topanga, who runs a "trendy aftershool hangout," keeping a watchful eye on her daughter and her friend.

" 'Girl Meets World' is a new show for a new generation that will be rooted in the same kind of honest, comedic storytelling about coming of age and the importance of family and friendship that made 'Boy Meets World' so popular," Jacobs said in a statement.

The series is scheduled to go into production this summer in LA and will premiere next year.

"In the same way audiences fell in love with Cory Matthews and Topanga Lawrence, we look forward to . . . building a memorable connection with a whole new generation of fans," Disney Channel programming exec Adam Bonnett said in a statement.


10.46 | 0 komentar | Read More

Sheen on rampage again: report

Charlie Sheen is in serious need of more "Anger Management."

The hotheaded, hard-partying actor flipped out over co-star Selma Blair, demanding she be fired from their FX comedy, it was reported yesterday.

Sheen went nuts after he heard Blair had complained to producers about his consistent tardiness and unprofessional behavior, show sources told TMZ.com.

Blair described Sheen as a "menace" to work with.

The former "Two and a Half Men" star told crew members he wasn't going to shoot yesterday if Blair was still in the cast.

Managers for Blair and Sheen, and reps for FX did not return messages seeking comment yesterday.

LOOK HERE: Sheen (right) and Selma Blair in a scene from the FX sitcom

Prashant Gupta/FX Network

LOOK HERE: Sheen (right) and Selma Blair in a scene from the FX sitcom "Anger Management."

Sheen has reportedly lobbying for FX to hire actress Mila Kunis — gal pal of his "Men" replacement Ashton Kutcher — to come on the show for 10 episodes at $1 million a pop.

While Sheen is said to be pushing to have Blair canned, show runners hope he'll calm down.

Sheen, 47, plays Charlie Goodson, a baseball player-turned-therapist, specializing in anger management.

Blair, 40, an indie-film fave, plays Kate Wales, Goodson's on-again, off-again lover.

Sheen is said to be an executive producer on "Anger Management," but his bio on IMDB — an Internet credits site — does not mention a producer credit for him.

"Anger Management" marked Sheen's big comeback to TV, following his spectacular meltdown and termination from top-rated "Two and a Half Men."

He spent eight seasons on the CBS sitcom — playing lothario Charlie Harper — when show producer and creator Chuck Lorre asked Sheen to cut back on his partying and late appearances to set.

Sheen exploded at Lorre, disparaging him to anyone who'd listen.

His choice words for Lorre included "narcissist," "coward," "loser" and "spineless rat."

When Sheen was fired in early 2011, he went on a one-man show tour — and hosted a bizarre Internet show called "Sheen's Corner" — boasting about his "warlock" powers, "tiger blood" and "Adonis DNA."


10.46 | 0 komentar | Read More

A gambling man

Gov. Cuomo has a curious way of letting New Yorkers decide an issue: If the voters disapprove an expansion of full-scale casino gambling at the polls this November, he's going to expand it anyway.

That's the upshot of the governor's latest bid for seven new casinos. Under legislation he's backing, four casinos would be approved upstate. They would operate exclusively for seven years before the remaining three are sited and approved.

But before any of this can happen, New Yorkers would have to approve a constitutional amendment to allow casinos here. The racetrack racinos — which recognize the new casinos as new competition — are fighting the deal. They threaten to mobilize voters against any casino vote.

Chad Rachman/New York Post

Andrew Cuomo

But the governor's got that bet covered. If the voters reject his constitutional amendment, he'll authorize the state Lottery Division to sign up new agents for thousands of video-lottery terminals upstate and in the outer boroughs. In other words, more direct competition for the racinos.

And more gambling in New York, no matter how New Yorkers vote.

We've always been leery about Albany's reliance on gambling either as a source of jobs or tax revenue. We believe, as apparently most New Yorkers believe, that the state would be better served by a business climate that encourages investment and innovation instead of one that seems increasingly to rely on lucrative, government-backed gambling oligopolies.

It's good that New Yorkers will get to vote on gambling this November. How much better it would be if the vote might actually count for something.

Have an opinion on this Post editorial? Send it in to LETTERS@NYPOST.COM!


10.46 | 0 komentar | Read More

Miss USA’s big miss

One of the charms of watching a beauty pageant these days seems to be the inevitable YouTube moment when a contestant botches a question designed to show her bikini comes with a brain.

So no one can really be surprised by the torrent of tweets and snarks following Sunday's Miss USA contest, where Miss Utah flubbed a question about the gender gap on wages. Yet as badly as Miss Utah may have answered, the question itself was dumber still. Because the idea that women in America earn less today because of some discrimination — implicit in this question — is a politically correct cliché.

AP

Miss Utah Marissa Powell

Here's what Miss Utah was asked: "A recent report shows that in 40 percent of American families with children, women are the primary earners, yet they continue to earn less than men. What does this say about society?"

We're not sure what this says about society, but it sure says something about the Miss Universe Organization that oversees the competition. We would refer them to the Web site for the Independent Women's Forum, where there's a terrific new video called "Straight Talk About the Wage Gap."

It points out that when differences in education levels, in the fields of work, in hours worked and choices about family are factored in, the so-called wage gap largely disappears. It points out, too, that "younger, college-educated women in urban areas actually out-earn their male counterparts."

So by all means, let's all indulge our feelings of superiority toward a 21-year-old model. But what of the geniuses whose question sounds like it came straight from Ashley Judd's Twitter feed?

Have an opinion on this Post editorial? Send it in to LETTERS@NYPOST.COM!


10.46 | 0 komentar | Read More

Murder & monitors

If Eric Holder is looking for a police force that could use a federal monitor, maybe he should look in his boss's hometown.

Last week at the last hour, the attorney general chose to insert himself in New York, where we have a trial in federal court over the constitutionality of the stop-and-frisk program. The argument is that the NYPD is violating the civil rights of minority citizens. So Holder's Department of Justice entered a brief supporting the idea of a federal monitor for our cops, which is bound to happen because Judge Shira Scheindlin wants to do it anyway.

AP

Eric Holder

Meanwhile, in a city rapidly becoming known as Murder Capital USA, Chicago just experienced another bloody weekend. Forty-six people were shot, with at least seven killed. That brings the total number of killings in Chicago for this year to 171 — out of a population of 2.7 million.

Compare that with New York. We have had fewer murders (144) even though we have three times as many people.

Given these numbers, if ever there were a city crying out for a federal monitor it would seem to be Chicago. Especially if you believe that the government ought to intervene when police policies have such a disparate impact by race.

It's hard to argue with the numbers. In Chicago, which is 45 percent white and 33 percent black, African-Americans make up 77 percent of the murder victims against only 2 percent for whites. In New York, blacks also suffer disproportionately from murder. The difference is that Mayor Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Ray Kelly's success in bringing the murder rate down to record lows means hundreds of African-Americans in this city are alive today because of the NYPD.

If the Department of Justice's concern is for fundamental civil liberties, it's hard to see how there's anything more fundamental than the right not to be murdered. Just ask the suffering citizens of Chicago.

Have an opinion on this Post editorial? Send it in to LETTERS@NYPOST.COM!


10.46 | 0 komentar | Read More

Stephen Hawking’s universe

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 09 Mei 2013 | 10.46

Stephen Hawking is famous for insisting that the strongest arguments are based on reason while the weakest are based on authority. So it's curious to see the eminent physicist using his authority as a physicist to elevate politics over free inquiry by joining an academic boycott of Israel.

Hawking had been set to headline an annual, star-studded geopolitical conference next month convened by Israeli President Shimon Peres. But yesterday, in a statement issued in his name, Hawking said he was withdrawing "based on advice from Palestinian academics."

AP

Stephen Hawking

As the Israeli Foreign Ministry conceded, "Never has a scientist of this stature boycotted Israel."

This is ironic in more than one way. To begin with, among the most impressive things about Hawking is that he has achieved what he has while living with a severe motor-neuron disease. If his life is a little easier today, it's because he can communicate via technology running on a computer chip designed by Intel's Israel-based team.

For another, the high-powered confab he'd agreed to attend included not only Bill Clinton, Tony Blair and Mikhail Gorbachev but also Munib al-Masri — a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council. It's hard to imagine another place in the Middle East that would be as open or inclusive.

Then again, though Hawking has visited Israel before, he's also compared it to apartheid-era South Africa and demanded that Jerusalem negotiate with Hamas.

He's entitled to his politics, of course. Even if the only thing that makes his boycott attention-grabbing is not his science but his celebrity.

Have an opinion on this Post editorial? Send it in to LETTERS@NYPOST.COM!


10.46 | 0 komentar | Read More

Hefner struggles as Mets fall to White Sox

It took just one batter for Jeremy Hefner to dim the afterglow of Matt Harvey's masterpiece start, just one hitter for him to allow a home run and remind everyone just how big the gap is between Harvey and the rest of the Mets' rotation.

The winless Hefner wasn't terrible in the Mets' 6-3 loss to the White Sox Wednesday night, but he was far from terrific, and that's exactly what the Amazin's need from their starter, with the way they have hit lately.

The Mets have mustered four runs in their past 20 innings and, despite Lucas Duda coming to the plate as the potential tying run in the eighth, never appeared to threaten in front of an announced crowd of 21,470 fans at soggy Citi Field.

After his nine innings of one-hit ball on Tuesday, Harvey is 4-0 with a 1.28 ERA. But after Hefner allowed eight hits and four runs (all earned) in his six middling innings of work last night, the rest of the Mets' rotation not named Harvey has struggled with a 4.96 ERA.

It was a disappointing outing for Hefner (0-4), unable to build on a solid outing last Tuesday in Miami. After struggling through his first four starts with a bloated 7.07 ERA, he seemingly had righted the ship. Over his previous two starts he posted a sterling 1.80 ERA and hoped to carry that over against Chicago.

"It's all about command,'' manager Terry Collins said beforehand. "The other day in Miami, his velocity was up [and] his command was better. He was ahead in the count and therefore he gets hitters to chase a little bit. When he's getting ahead, he pitches very well.''

He surrendered a home run last night to the first batter he faced. Alejandro De Aza went deep on a 2-2 pitch. Then, after Duda's second-inning solo shot into the right field loge for his seventh homer of the season, Hefner coughed up three more runs in the third.

After singles by De Aza and Alexi Ramirez, Hefner saw right fielder Alex Rios — whose infield single with two out in the seventh inning spoiled Harvey's perfect game — stroke an RBI double. Hefner fell behind Conor Gillaspie 3-1 before the third baseman dropped an 85 mph changeup into shallow left center between three converging Mets for two more RBIs and a 4-1 lead.

Hefner gave way after six, and reliever Scott Atchison surrendered a run in the seventh on Paul Konerko's RBI bloop single to right.

The Mets mustered next to nothing against White Sox starter Jake Peavy (4-1), who allowed just three hits and one run in his 6 2/3 innings.

Even their successes came with Keystone moments of high comedy. Pinch-hitter Justin Turner singled to right in the eighth inning, and as Ruben Tejada came around to make it 5-2 on Rios' error, Turner rounded first and face-planted in the dirt.

Duda crushed a solo shot into the right field loge in the second inning for his seventh home run of the season. But when he came up with two on and two out in the eighth, with a chance to tie the game, he fanned on a 73 mph curveball.

Rios absolutely crushed a Jeurys Familia fastball to left for a ninth-inning solo shot. Tejada delivered an RBI single in the bottom of the ninth, but the Mets got no closer.

brian.lewis@nypost.com


10.46 | 0 komentar | Read More

Can dirty Harry clean up his image?

It's been eight months since the infamous strip billiards incident when the world (almost) got to see Prince Harry's crown jewels as he partied in the nude with a bevy of Las Vegas beauties in his VIP suite at the Wynn.

Today marks the playboy prince's first visit to the States since the scandal — this time, he's staying for a week of official engagements, including a trip to the storm-ravaged Jersey Shore. According to some observers, it's all part of an effort to rehabilitate the image of the royal who's third in line to the throne and a first-class troublemaker.

AP

HARRY TO THE RESCUE: Army man Prince Harry is hoping to clean up his party boy image with an official tour to the US, which will see him visiting Sandy-ravaged New Jersey on Tuesday.

Photos: Dirty Harry: Playboy Prince or Proper Prince?

"He has quite an agenda ahead to clean up his act," says Leslie Singer, branding expert for the Manhattan-based consultants Singer Salt, who has been following Harry's fortunes on both sides of the pond.

The US is "the global thermometer of what's in and what's out, and then everybody seems to follow suit. If the Americans love him and can forgive him, then hopefully everyone else will, too."

Harry's Vegas hangover is only the latest in a string of devilish misdeeds including but not limited to: smoking weed in 2002, wearing a Nazi armband at a party in 2005, and swallowing a live goldfish at a wedding reception in 1999. Earlier this year, he controversially compared his time serving as an attack gunner in Afghanistan to playing a video game, calling it "a joy for me because I'm one of those people that loves playing PlayStation and Xbox, so with my thumbs I like to think I'm probably quite useful."

While many of the royal family members find Prince Harry amusing (pictures of him joking with his sister-in-law, Duchess Kate, speak to his charms), the 28-year-old has also shone an unwelcome spotlight on the decadent, out-of-touch reputation of the aristocracy. This trip is meant to remind the public that he's his mother's son: empathetic, personable and charitable. And so, in the words of one royal aide who spoke to The Post anonymously, he'll be "kept on the leash."

Practically every day of Harry's Rehab Tour is planned to the last second with sobering excursions to Arlington Cemetery, the Warrior Games for wounded soldiers in Colorado Springs, and underprivileged areas here in New York City. On Tuesday, he will visit sections of the Jersey Shore hit hardest by Hurricane Sandy with Gov. Chris Christie, and check out the rebuilding efforts in Mantoloking and Seaside Heights. (Only Monday is unaccounted for on Harry's schedule, allowing for travel and R&R instead of hanky panky.)

According to his friends, Harry has a wish list of New York destinations that he won't be able to check off this visit. They include clubs Lavo, Kiss and Fly, and The Box (he's a discreet regular at The Box in London).


10.46 | 0 komentar | Read More

The Benghazi beat

In the run-up to yesterday's House hearings on Benghazi, we were struck by a column by The New York Times' public editor. It was written in response to readers angry that the paper was not giving the Benghazi hearings the coverage they merited.

After suggesting that such criticism was politically motivated and "fomented by Fox News," the editor offered an interesting conclusion. "The Times," she wrote, "has had a tendency to both play down the subject, which has significant news value, and to pursue it most aggressively as a story about political divisiveness rather than one about national security mistakes and the lack of government transparency."

AP

President Obama

Translation: The critics are right.

We don't mean to single out the Times. For eight months now, the national press corps has shown little interest in questioning President Obama's narrative that any mistakes made before, during or after the Benghazi attacks were through incompetence brought about by the fog of war.

That storyline took a big hit yesterday on Capitol Hill from three State Department officers who had direct knowledge of the events surrounding that deadly terror assault. If their testimony is true, key aspects of the administration's narrative do not hold. And if it's also true that some were pressured to keep their mouths shut, we now have an even bigger story — which should especially interest those who complain the issue has been "politicized."

Not that the press corps doesn't know how to hold a pol accountable. At Mitt Romney's press conference the day after the attacks on our diplomatic posts, six of the eight questions directed at the GOP candidate were about the appropriateness of his statement on Egypt rather than what went down there.

President Obama has faced nothing remotely like that in the eight months since those four Americans were killed. Judging from yesterday's testimony from three compelling witnesses, it's time he did.

Have an opinion on this Post editorial? Send it in to LETTERS@NYPOST.COM!


10.46 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger